Price Subsidies, Diagnostic Tests, and Targeting of Malaria Treatment: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial
نویسندگان
چکیده
In response to parasite resistance to older malaria medicines, the global health community is planning to make new, more effective malaria treatments called Artemisinin Combination Therapies (ACTs) available over-the-counter at heavily subsidized rates throughout Africa. While this may go a long way toward reducing under-treatment (thereby saving lives in the short-run), it is also likely to increase over-treatment, wasting subsidy dollars and contributing to drug resistance (thereby making lives harder to save in the long-run). We use data from a randomized controlled trial conducted with over 2,700 households in rural Kenya to study behavioral responses to changes in ACT prices and quantify this tradeoff. We find that ACT use increases by 59 percent in the presence of an ACT subsidy over 90 percent. However, only 56 percent of those buying such a highly subsidized ACT at the drug shop test positive for malaria. We show that this share increases (without substantially compromising access) to 81 percent when the over-the-counter ACT subsidy is somewhat reduced and resources are redirected towards a subsidy for rapid malaria tests. Making such tests available over-thecounter more than doubles the rate at which illnesses are tested for malaria, confering benefits that extend beyond improved targeting of the ACT subsidy. ∗We thank the Clinton Health Access Initiative and Novartis Pharmaceuticals for financial support. We are very grateful to the Kenya Ministry of Health, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Collaborative, Kenya CDC, PSIKenya, Jean Arkedis, Justin Cohen and Oliver Sabot for consultation and feedback on the study design and Asim Khwaja, Ramanan Laxminarayan, Anup Malani, Sendhil Mullainathan, Sarah Reber, John Strauss and numerous seminar participants for helpful feedback. We thank Katie Conn and Sarah Walker for excellent study coordination, Moses Baraza for smooth implementation of the project and the IPA-Kenya field officers for superb data collection. All errors are our own. †Jessica Cohen: Harvard School of Public Health and Brookings Institution, [email protected]. Pascaline Dupas: Stanford Department of Economics, [email protected]. Simone Schaner: Dartmouth College Department of Economics, [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Innovative public–private partnership to target subsidised antimalarials: a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate a community intervention in Western Kenya
INTRODUCTION There are concerns of inappropriate use of subsidised antimalarials due to the large number of fevers treated in the informal sector with minimal access to diagnostic testing. Targeting antimalarial subsidies to confirmed malaria cases can lead to appropriate, effective therapy. There is evidence that community health volunteers (CHVs) can be trained to safely and correctly use rap...
متن کاملAssessing the independent and combined effects of subsidies for antimalarials and rapid diagnostic testing on fever management decisions in the retail sector: results from a factorial randomised trial in western Kenya
OBJECTIVES There is an urgent need to understand how to improve targeting of artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) to patients with confirmed malaria infection, including subsidised ACTs sold over-the-counter. We hypothesised that offering an antimalarial subsidy conditional on a positive malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) would increase uptake of testing and improve rational use of ACTs. ME...
متن کاملEffectiveness of family empowerment program on level of adherence to treatment regimens in stroke patients; a randomized controlled trial
Background: Different physical and mental complications in patients with stroke, and the chronic nature of the disease, require the presence of their family as the primary source of constant care and support at home. However, for many reasons, such as not receiving adequate support from the medical staff, families face many failures in managing the care programs. Aim: to investigate the effects...
متن کاملPopulation-Wide Malaria Testing and Treatment with Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Artemether-Lumefantrine in Southern Zambia: A community Randomized Step-Wedge Control Trial Design
Reducing the human reservoir of malaria parasites is critical for elimination. We conducted a community randomized controlled trial in Southern Province, Zambia to assess the impact of three rounds of a mass test and treatment (MTAT) intervention on malaria prevalence and health facility outpatient case incidence using random effects logistic regression and negative binomial regression, respect...
متن کاملArtemether-Lumefantrine Versus Chloroquine for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Plasmodium knowlesi Malaria: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial CAN KNOW
Background Plasmodium knowlesi is reported increasingly across Southeast Asia and is the most common cause of malaria in Malaysia. No randomized trials have assessed the comparative efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) for knowlesi malaria. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 3 district hospitals in Sabah, Malaysia to compare the efficacy of AL against chloroquine (CQ) ...
متن کامل